/
Shortcuts: "t:" searches only in tasks, "p:" searches only in projects, "u:" searches only in users. For example, "t:analysis" or "p:prototypeXYZ" All available shortcuts: t|task|tasks|i|issue|issues - search only by tasks; p|project|projects - search only by projects; u|user|users - search only by users.
Hash #: By using # with task ID, you will jump to the task directly. Without the # symbol, the result only matches the searched numbers (don't expect ID).
Operators AND OR NOT XOR: For example 'man OR (dog AND cat)'.
Operators '+' and '-': A group of terms with some marked with + and - will match items containing all of the + terms, but none of the - terms. Terms not marked with + or - contribute towards the item rankings. You can also use + and - on phrases and on bracketed expressions. For example 'one +two -three'.
Operator NEAR: 'one NEAR two NEAR three' matches items containing those words within 10 words of each other. You can set the threshold to n by using NEAR/n like so: one NEAR/6 two.
Operator ADJ: ADJ is like NEAR but only matches if the words appear in the same order as in the query. So 'one ADJ two ADJ three' matches items containing those three words in that order and within 10 words of each other. You can set the threshold to n by using ADJ/n like so: 'one ADJ/6 two'.
Phrase searches: A phrase surrounded with double quotes ("") matches items containing that exact phrase. Hyphenated words are also treated as phrases, as are cases such as filenames and email addresses (e.g. /etc/passwd or president@whitehouse.gov).
Searching for proper names: If a query term is entered with a capitalised first letter, then it will be searched for unstemmed.
Wildcards: The query parser supports using a trailing '*' wildcard, which matches any number of trailing characters, so 'wildc*'' would match wildcard, wildcarded, wildcards, wildcat, wildcats, etc.
Searching within a free-text field: You can search within specific fields. For example 'title:support content:shop' might find items with 'support' in the title and 'shop' in the content. You can also specify a prefix on a quoted phrase (e.g. title:"one two") or on a bracketed subexpression (e.g. title:(mice men)). Allowed search fields: title, content, journals, attachments.
Recently viewed
Mail subject
Reply to
Mail copy
Mail sender
Mail recipient
Task #1001 has been updated by Malle Avarsoo. I add some clinical and grouping details to discussion , which I have seen in EST version. The NCSP codes in table from Kristiina, valid for EST version, despite of several procpro-s , end up in conservative DRG-s , although they have also procpro 06S10 Other digestive system OR procedure. JCSA45 Endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection in oesophagus PROCPR 06S10 2 FALSE Other digestive system OR procedure est/swe/lat/ice/fin/nor JDSA45 Endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection in stomach or pylorus PROCPR 06S10 2 FALSE Other digestive system OR procedure est/swe/lat/ice/fin/nor JDSH52 Endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection in duodenum PROCPR 06S10 2 FALSE Other digestive system OR procedure est/swe/lat/ice/fin/nor With these NCSP codes EST version gives these DRG groups , which clinically seems not quite right, as ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection) and EMR (Endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection) are both surgical interventions by endoscopic method. Seedeelundite pahaloomulised kasvajad, kht-ga 172X Digestive malignancy, w CC Seedeelundite pahaloomulised kasvajad, kht-ta 173X Digestive malignancy, w/o CC Hope Kristiina can check my finding for EST version. Claims data confims this, cases with ESD or EMR group into conservative groups. I suggest, that these cases which have the abovementioned NCSP codes should group into surgical DRG-s , as procpro 06S10 Other digestive system OR procedure , refers. Unfortunately I am not really able to post a technical change proposal, hope Kristiina and Lotta will give support in finding best solution. I would like to reopen the discussion of ESD treatment in gastrointestinal tract, that was discussed in case #925 . Now ESD treatment in colon is grouped the same way as regular colonoscopy, although ESD is considerably more time consuming, labor intensive and requires expensive equipment. Our gastroenterologists have brought this up again as the DRG grouping does not represent the treatment well. They have been in contact with Swedish and Norwegian colleagues who agree that change is needed. Therefore I would appreciate a discussion of the matter in the upcoming Expert meeting. I aim for having some cost analysis based on Icelandic data ready before the meeting.
I add some clinical and grouping details to discussion , which I have seen in EST version.
With these NCSP codes EST version gives these DRG groups , which clinically seems not quite right, as ESD (Endoscopic submucosal dissection) and EMR (Endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection) are both surgical interventions by endoscopic method.
Hope Kristiina can check my finding for EST version. Claims data confims this, cases with ESD or EMR group into conservative groups.
I suggest, that these cases which have the abovementioned NCSP codes should group into surgical DRG-s , as procpro 06S10 Other digestive system OR procedure , refers. Unfortunately I am not really able to post a technical change proposal, hope Kristiina and Lotta will give support in finding best solution.
I would like to reopen the discussion of ESD treatment in gastrointestinal tract, that was discussed in case #925 . Now ESD treatment in colon is grouped the same way as regular colonoscopy, although ESD is considerably more time consuming, labor intensive and requires expensive equipment. Our gastroenterologists have brought this up again as the DRG grouping does not represent the treatment well. They have been in contact with Swedish and Norwegian colleagues who agree that change is needed. Therefore I would appreciate a discussion of the matter in the upcoming Expert meeting. I aim for having some cost analysis based on Icelandic data ready before the meeting.