/
Shortcuts: "t:" searches only in tasks, "p:" searches only in projects, "u:" searches only in users. For example, "t:analysis" or "p:prototypeXYZ" All available shortcuts: t|task|tasks|i|issue|issues - search only by tasks; p|project|projects - search only by projects; u|user|users - search only by users.
Hash #: By using # with task ID, you will jump to the task directly. Without the # symbol, the result only matches the searched numbers (don't expect ID).
Operators AND OR NOT XOR: For example 'man OR (dog AND cat)'.
Operators '+' and '-': A group of terms with some marked with + and - will match items containing all of the + terms, but none of the - terms. Terms not marked with + or - contribute towards the item rankings. You can also use + and - on phrases and on bracketed expressions. For example 'one +two -three'.
Operator NEAR: 'one NEAR two NEAR three' matches items containing those words within 10 words of each other. You can set the threshold to n by using NEAR/n like so: one NEAR/6 two.
Operator ADJ: ADJ is like NEAR but only matches if the words appear in the same order as in the query. So 'one ADJ two ADJ three' matches items containing those three words in that order and within 10 words of each other. You can set the threshold to n by using ADJ/n like so: 'one ADJ/6 two'.
Phrase searches: A phrase surrounded with double quotes ("") matches items containing that exact phrase. Hyphenated words are also treated as phrases, as are cases such as filenames and email addresses (e.g. /etc/passwd or president@whitehouse.gov).
Searching for proper names: If a query term is entered with a capitalised first letter, then it will be searched for unstemmed.
Wildcards: The query parser supports using a trailing '*' wildcard, which matches any number of trailing characters, so 'wildc*'' would match wildcard, wildcarded, wildcards, wildcat, wildcats, etc.
Searching within a free-text field: You can search within specific fields. For example 'title:support content:shop' might find items with 'support' in the title and 'shop' in the content. You can also specify a prefix on a quoted phrase (e.g. title:"one two") or on a bracketed subexpression (e.g. title:(mice men)). Allowed search fields: title, content, journals, attachments.
Recently viewed
Mail subject
Reply to
Mail copy
Mail sender
Mail recipient
Task #1005 has been updated by Mats Fernström. Attachment TC_C1048_New.xlsx added Mats Fernström, the National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden, 2026-05-12 (SWE ID C1048)We have reviewed the result of the TC in case #982 - OR value of proc codes KEDE1B ... and found that the original grouping of AF032 Intrakoronart ultraljud och doppler (FNDE1B Intravascular ultrasonography of coronary arteries), AP052 Intravasalt ultraljud (PXDE1B Endovascular ultrasonography) XGX10 Intrapleural ultraljudsundersökning (GXDE00 Intrapleural ultrasonography) XPX30 Endovaskulärt ultraljud (PXDE1B Endovascular ultrasonography) provides a good description of the main problem (principal diagnosis). We also compared the individual healthcare costs with the DRG weights and found that the original grouping was OK also in a cost perspective. Thus, we suggest a new way of principal thinking: The few ultrasound procedures with OR 1 are alla performed under open surgery or laparoscopy and we see no need to change the OR value for those procedures. Ultrasound procedures that are performed transcutaneous could have OR 0 (zero) except when needle biopsy is performed, then OR 2 is more adequate. Other ultrasound procedures, for example together with endoscopy, could have OR 2. Then the following changes should be done: AJ077, Ultraljudsundersökning, bukvägg, (JADE1A, Ultrasound examination of groin and abdominal wall). Change OR from 2 to 0. TKE20, Punktionsbiopsi av prostata med MR-ultraljudsfusionsteknik, transrektal, (KEXX00, Prostate needle biopsy). Change OR from 0 to 2. TKE23, Punktionsbiopsi av prostata med MR-ultraljudsfusionsteknik, transperineal, (KEXX00, Prostate needle biopsy). Change OR from 0 to 2. We have tested these changes on our latest cost database (2024) with 16,5 million outpatient visits and 1,14 million hospital stays and there was no change of the grouping at all. Thus, we see no negative effects from the change and the principal thinking seems OK.TC_C1048 is attached. With a reference to #982 - OR value of proc codes KEDE1B ..., it was decided in EG Spring meeting that we create a new case to allow countries to have a look and check the OR values of all ultrasound codes as they lack consistency - some have OR 1, some OR 2 but most have OR 0. Text written by Sweden/Mats is copied here:In the Swedish version of NordDRG, the OR property 2 has a rather low impact. Out of 4 576 rules in the table drg_logic there are only 120 rules with the letter P. Most of them (109 rules) are about endoscopy. However, the OR value can be seen as a very rough estimate of resource consumption and then we have thought of a principal thinking: Ultrasound procedures that require laparotomy, laparoscopy, thoracotomy, or incision of the skin could have OR 1. Ultrasound procedures that require endoscopy could have OR 2. Ultrasound procedures that are performed transcutaneous could have OR 0 (zero) except when needle biopsy is performed, then OR 2 is probably more adequate. With this principle in mind, we tried the following six changes on our patient database for 2024: AF032 Intrakoronart ultraljud och doppler (FNDE1B Intravascular ultrasonography of coronary arteries) from OR 2 to OR 1. AP052 Intravasalt ultraljud (PXDE1B Endovascular ultrasonography) from OR 2 to OR 1 TKE20 Punktionsbiopsi av prostata med MR-ultraljudsfusionsteknik, transrektal (KEXX00 Prostate needle biopsy) from OR 0 to OR 2. TKE23 Punktionsbiopsi av prostata med MR-ultraljudsfusionsteknik, transperineal (KEXX00 Prostate needle biopsy) from OR 0 to OR 2. XGX10 Intrapleural ultraljudsundersökning (GXDE00 Intrapleural ultrasonography) from OR 2 to OR 1. XPX30 Endovaskulärt ultraljud (PXDE1B Endovascular ultrasonography) from OR 2 to OR 1. The result was that we got a lot of cases in DRG Z60 ‘Annan sällsynt, eller felaktig, kombination av huvuddiagnos och åtgärd’ (DRG 477 ‘Other rare or incorrect combination of principal diagnosis and procedure’) because of the change from OR 2 to OR 1 for FNDE1B, PXDE1B and GXDE00. The question then is whether these cases really are incorrectly primary coded or whether the grouping logic needs to be supplemented with new rules that lead to adequate descriptive DRGs. Using this as a starting point, all countries are kindly invited to share their thoughts on three principles Mats is suggesting when it comes to determining the OR value of ultrasound procedures and check the data if they support this. If not, or if countries suggest different approach, please share via this ticket. The task type is currently set to ‘Development initiative.’
Mats Fernström, the National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden, 2026-05-12 (SWE ID C1048)
We have reviewed the result of the TC in case #982 - OR value of proc codes KEDE1B ... and found that the original grouping of
provides a good description of the main problem (principal diagnosis). We also compared the individual healthcare costs with the DRG weights and found that the original grouping was OK also in a cost perspective.
Thus, we suggest a new way of principal thinking:
Then the following changes should be done:
We have tested these changes on our latest cost database (2024) with 16,5 million outpatient visits and 1,14 million hospital stays and there was no change of the grouping at all. Thus, we see no negative effects from the change and the principal thinking seems OK.
TC_C1048 is attached.
With a reference to #982 - OR value of proc codes KEDE1B ..., it was decided in EG Spring meeting that we create a new case to allow countries to have a look and check the OR values of all ultrasound codes as they lack consistency - some have OR 1, some OR 2 but most have OR 0.
Text written by Sweden/Mats is copied here:
In the Swedish version of NordDRG, the OR property 2 has a rather low impact. Out of 4 576 rules in the table drg_logic there are only 120 rules with the letter P. Most of them (109 rules) are about endoscopy. However, the OR value can be seen as a very rough estimate of resource consumption and then we have thought of a principal thinking:
With this principle in mind, we tried the following six changes on our patient database for 2024:
The result was that we got a lot of cases in DRG Z60 ‘Annan sällsynt, eller felaktig, kombination av huvuddiagnos och åtgärd’ (DRG 477 ‘Other rare or incorrect combination of principal diagnosis and procedure’) because of the change from OR 2 to OR 1 for FNDE1B, PXDE1B and GXDE00.
The question then is whether these cases really are incorrectly primary coded or whether the grouping logic needs to be supplemented with new rules that lead to adequate descriptive DRGs.
Using this as a starting point, all countries are kindly invited to share their thoughts on three principles Mats is suggesting when it comes to determining the OR value of ultrasound procedures and check the data if they support this. If not, or if countries suggest different approach, please share via this ticket.
The task type is currently set to ‘Development initiative.’